From 18b40961103ac936e7afc77cda4bbb462e30e7b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jrandom Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 03:19:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] filtered out the junk --- pages/meeting122.html | 43 ------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 43 deletions(-) diff --git a/pages/meeting122.html b/pages/meeting122.html index 372dbe9f..bb6e2409 100644 --- a/pages/meeting122.html +++ b/pages/meeting122.html @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@

13:10 <+postman> yep

13:10 < mule2> as kind of cover traffic

13:10 <@jrandom> mule2: its a matter of our load being much less than our network capacity

-

13:10 -!- PieSpy [piespy@irc.metropipe.net] has quit [Ping timeout]

13:11 <@jrandom> i dont think we'll be able to keep the capacity greater than the load for long

13:11 < ant> <jnymo> mule2, postman is also act as i mixer.. so its hard to tell where you packets are going after they go in

13:11 <@jrandom> so i'm not too worried about not pushing any data through slower peers

@@ -37,7 +36,6 @@

13:12 < jdot__> i it a security issue that one router handles all(ish) tunnels?

13:13 <@jrandom> mule2: lets first get it as good as we can get it, then we can discuss proactively making it worse

13:13 <@jrandom> jdot__: we don't have one router handling all of the traffic, but we are seeing the grouping of routers who are on very fast connections (colo, etc) handling more than dialup/dsl/cable users

-

13:13 -!- lektriK [fugly@free.baffled.i2p] has joined #i2p

13:14 <@jrandom> plus the reduced tunnel failures means we're shifting & exploring less

13:14 < mule2> perhaps some traffic distribution would be possible, as long as we are far from the routers limits

13:14 <@jrandom> right, probabalistic tunnel rejection is in the router and can be enabled based on the router's bandwidth limits

@@ -48,18 +46,14 @@

13:15 < lektriK> can I close the Start I2P window?

13:15 * postman is very sorry NOT to restrict his bandwidth

13:16 <@jrandom> lektriK: unfortunately, not really, unless you start i2p as a service (See http://localhost:7657/configservice.jsp)

-

13:16 -!- scintilla [scintilla@free.baffled.i2p] has quit [Ping timeout]

13:16 <@jrandom> heh postman dont worry, we'll back off your router if/when we reach your router's capacity

13:17 < lektriK> Ok, it sais service started

13:17 < lektriK> can I close it now?

-

13:17 -!- scintilla [scintilla@free.baffled.i2p] has joined #i2p

13:17 <@jrandom> lektriK: no/yes - you can shut down your router then start it again via start->run->"net start i2p"

13:18 < mule2> as it is, a few very big routers could handle all the tunnels, removing all cover traffic from all other routers. but lets continue with that after the meeting.

13:18 < mule2> don't want to complain about the network behaving to good :)

-

13:18 -!- Sugadude [Sugadude@free.duck.i2p] has quit [Ping timeout]

13:18 <@jrandom> hehe

13:20 <@jrandom> some further exploration will occur with 0.5, though there are anonymity related issues with spreading too far. there'll be further details to be worked through on that for 0.5 though (and in the doc which might be ready next week as a first draft)

-

13:20 -!- Sugadude [Sugadude@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

13:21 <@jrandom> anyway, anyone else have something to bring up for 0.4.2.5?

13:21 <@jrandom> or shall we move on briefly to 2) 0.5?

13:21 <+postman> move

@@ -74,20 +68,6 @@

13:23 <@jrandom> aye, there are definitely some important revamping going on, based on what we've learned over the last 16 months

13:23 <@jrandom> (or shit, 18)

13:23 <+postman> jrandom: so 0.5 will emnploy a new tunnel management system mostly?

-

13:23 -!- scintilla [scintilla@free.baffled.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- lektriK [fugly@free.baffled.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- mule [anon@free.baffled.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- Myo9 [myo9@free.baffled.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- Madman2003 [Miranda@free.baffled.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- fedo [fedo@free.baffled.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- Delta [Blow@free.baffled.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- ptm [ptm@free.duck.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- jdot__ [jdot@free.duck.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- slaw [a@free.duck.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- Frooze [Frooze@free.duck.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- jdot [jdot@free.duck.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- mule2 [anon@free.duck.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

-

13:23 -!- ]Replica[ [ghfd@free.duck.i2p] has quit [irc.duck.i2p irc.baffled.i2p]

13:23 < ant> <Quadn-werk> arg, i hope i didnt interrupt the meeting :/

13:23 <+postman> wow

13:23 < ant> <Quadn-werk> sorry heh

@@ -99,22 +79,8 @@

13:24 <@jrandom> sup jnymo?

13:24 <+postman> jrandom: will every tunnel be a separate local destination still?

13:25 <@jrandom> huzzawuzzah?

-

13:25 -!- scintilla [scintilla@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- mule [anon@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- Myo9 [myo9@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- Madman2003 [Miranda@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- Delta [Blow@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- fedo [fedo@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- ptm [ptm@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- jdot__ [jdot@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- slaw [a@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- Frooze [Frooze@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- jdot [jdot@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- mule2 [anon@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

-

13:25 -!- ]Replica[ [ghfd@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

13:25 <@jrandom> there won't be any change to i2ptunnel in 0.5

13:25 <+postman> jrandom: ok

-

13:25 -!- asciiwhite [scegs@free.duck.i2p] has quit [Connection reset by peer]

13:25 <@jrandom> (at least, i dont plan on any)

13:26 < mule> postman mounting an intersection attack?

13:26 < ant> <jnymo> for those who aren't getting /any/ bandwidth usage.. how bout letting routers build tunnels with them in it.. like ABCABCA

@@ -136,7 +102,6 @@

13:31 < ant> <jnymo> jrandom: k cool

13:31 <+postman> k

13:31 < scintilla> jrandom, wrt to letting clients choose tunnel length: will there be anything in place to keep ppl from cranking it up to 99 (or whatever)?

-

13:31 -!- asciiwhite [scegs@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

13:31 < ant> <jnymo> cpu power

13:32 <@jrandom> when necessary we can add hashcash, but excessively long tunnels will just end up failing anyway

13:32 < scintilla> ah good point

@@ -159,10 +124,7 @@

13:37 <@jrandom> yeah frosk

13:37 < frosk> goodie

13:37 <@jrandom> i wont dawdle too much longer on the streaming lib, i promise ;)

-

13:37 -!- modulus [Administra@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

13:37 < frosk> it just sounds like a lot of work :)

-

13:38 -!- Meomia [Meomia@free.duck.i2p] has quit [Quit: smutter]

-

13:38 -!- cat-a-puss [tom@free.baffled.i2p] has joined #i2p

13:38 <@jrandom> its actually not so bad, the hard part is getting the algorithms right

13:38 <@jrandom> (details schmetails ;)

13:39 <+postman> frosk: and it's all on paper already

@@ -195,11 +157,9 @@

13:43 < mule> sorry, the comment was from frosk

13:43 < ant> * jnymo pulles out that crappy box wine

13:43 < mule> frosk: do you also hand over the bonus cheque ?

-

13:43 -!- jrandom2p [jrandom@free.duck.i2p] has quit [Ping timeout]

13:43 <@jrandom> (it waits a bit to send the SYN and the related ACK in case there is more data to bundle)

13:43 < scintilla> oh fyi, i should be receiving the book with the fortuna algorithm spec in it soon... in the meantime i've been experimenting with trying to gather entropy in java without destroying a machine

13:44 <@jrandom> ah kickass

-

13:44 -!- tessier [treed@free.duck.i2p] has quit [Ping timeout]

13:44 < ant> <jnymo> mmm, someone was wanting to mount some attacks on i2p

13:44 < ant> <jnymo> who was that?

13:44 <@jrandom> connelly

@@ -221,12 +181,9 @@

13:49 <@jrandom> or even =100

13:49 * jrandom flings mud at jnymo

13:50 < ant> <jnymo> i actually do work with x500 and my job lets me have free winSevers

-

13:50 -!- mule [anon@free.duck.i2p] has quit [Ping timeout]

13:50 < ant> <jnymo> so, perhaps i'll just set up a central DNS for testing purposes in a month or two

-

13:50 -!- mule2 [anon@free.duck.i2p] has quit [Ping timeout]

13:51 <@jrandom> heh, having a centralized naming server hosted on a .mil would be bloody hilarious

13:51 < ant> <jnymo> though hacking i2p addresses into winserver may be non-trivial.. dunno

-

13:51 -!- mule2 [anon@free.duck.i2p] has joined #i2p

13:51 < ant> <jnymo> heh.. dnsalias is the ticket

13:52 <@jrandom> nano has done some really cool work, integrating dnsjava with i2p

13:52 < ant> <jnymo> ooooh