20:00:26 0. Hi 20:00:26 1. anoncoin.i2p console home page request (Meeh) 20:00:26 2. Git (Meeh) 20:00:26 3. Echelon reduced services / incorporation 20:00:26 0. Hi 20:00:27 Hi 20:00:33 Let's limit each topic to about 15 minutes 20:01:43 hi 20:02:02 Hi. 20:02:29 hi eche|on 20:02:39 o/ orion 20:02:48 hi 20:04:08 yo topz 20:05:15 hey 20:05:26 netsplit 20:05:54 boo 20:05:59 hiss 20:06:15 * inscrut_ lobs a tomato 20:08:58 alright, meeting's over. Move along now 20:09:01 on topics 0-2 I am rather more or less "go ahead". 20:09:12 ok lets try this again 20:09:12 0. Hi 20:09:12 1. anoncoin.i2p console home page request (Meeh) 20:09:12 2. Git (Meeh) 20:09:12 3. Echelon reduced services / incorporation 20:09:12 0. Hi 20:09:12 Hi 20:09:12 Let's limit each topic to about 15 minutes 20:09:12 For 2 and 3, which are large and oft-discussed topics, let's focus on where we are now and what to do next, not how we got here 20:09:12 I don't expect to reach any decisions on 2 or 3, but it would be nice to come up with next steps for research if necessary 20:09:12 Also, background on the agenda items are at the link in /topic above. 20:09:12 1. anoncoin.i2p console home page request (Meeh) 20:09:12 Meeh are you here? 20:09:12 skipping 1 and 2 20:09:12 3. Echelon reduced services / incorporation 20:09:12 eche|on, are you here? 20:09:44 so we skipped 1 and 2 and are on 3. eche|on the floor is yours 20:10:12 due to a lot of private and non private issues, I reduced my services and will reduce some more 20:10:20 e.g. false.i2p is down 20:10:48 which service will be next I cannot tell currently, I will keep on being the money guy for this year at least 20:11:27 I just got some thoughts now tha I could not stop I2P from loosing money due to fraud and other stuff, it gets harder 20:11:54 also the more money, the tougher it gets, esp. with companies donation money to us, which we should spent on "useful" stuff. 20:12:17 I'd like to interject. 20:12:19 it is all not really clear, more a "feeling", I know, but I just want to inform you 20:13:33 Thanks for the time it lasted, anyway. 20:13:33 hi 20:13:33 eche|on, you have any specific proposals to bring to us today? 20:14:30 two possibilities that may lessen your workload slightly - making orion "asst. treasurer - U.S. $$" and Meeh "asst. treasurer - BTC/altcoin" --- would either of those help at all? 20:14:31 my propopsal: think hard about getting incorporated and if not 20:14:50 a $ treasurer will help for $ donations, sure 20:15:00 and meeh for alt/btc would be fine, too 20:15:43 is it possible to publicise the books? perhaps as a dual-entry ledger? 20:15:52 books? 20:16:01 http://echelon.i2p/donations/index.html 20:16:09 Title: Donations (at echelon.i2p) 20:16:26 I want to make two separate proposals. The first one is thus: We should keep the money spread out in multiple currencies (dollar, euro, *coin). 20:16:39 And they should be held in different jurisdictions. 20:16:40 my bigger problem/fear is the amount of nearly 40k € in my hand. as this is "official" my money, for the law. not I2p. 20:17:54 hmm. So if you independently have financial trouble, legally you would need to wipe out I2P funds. 20:18:15 correct 20:18:32 thats the problem with being not a legal entity 20:18:54 and thats why I do not want more than 50k € here, more or less 20:21:36 eche|on: Before considering incorporation, do you agree that the money should be held in both different currencies and jurisdictions? 20:21:43 I do not have big problems (personal) with more than 50k, but if there are problems, I2P will loose, which is not my intention 20:22:05 there's some benefit in keeping a $$ account. Much of our income and expenses is in $$ and we lose lots in the round-trip conversions 20:22:13 orion: a US based $ account is usefull and if someone wants it: yes 20:22:34 I will volunteer to hold USD in an account. 20:23:40 is it managable for mutliple ppl to hold money and yet roll up the totals and transactions on the hall-of-fame page? 20:24:25 it is possible due to mtn/git hosting of our webpage 20:24:42 we would need a table/section for each currency 20:25:06 displaying it is simple 20:25:07 if we want to divide ONE currency upon 2+x people, they need to interact good 20:26:58 eche|on would remain treasurer and responsible for keeping the totals, with assistants responsible for keeping track of their part? 20:27:00 about incorporation: 50k € is not worth the hassle IMHO, but there IS a risk 20:27:16 zzz: would be fine. 20:27:30 incororation does very little to reduce risk 20:27:50 but it takes the risk off me ;-) 20:29:03 I have a proposal that doesn't involve incorporation: a trust fund 20:29:03 doesn't prevent willful money loss, but prevents legal loss due to personal insolvency 20:29:06 so the proposal is to make orion an assistant treasurer - U.S. --- any objections or further discussion on that? 20:29:07 don't spend the bitcoins on acid 20:29:09 I second orion's nomination 20:29:59 ok sounds like a done deal, eche|on and orion can work out the details. 20:30:16 addendum to the topic list: 20:30:24 4. 50BTC Bitcoin client bounty 20:30:43 We're about at the end of our 15 minutes. Any next steps on incorporation or proposals or things to do or research re: incorporation? 20:30:53 50BTC is alot of money for a plugin of I2P btc. Proposal: reduce to 10 and 40BTC into general fund 20:31:05 ok ech you're on the list for #4 20:31:15 topiltzin: I won't. :x 20:31:29 last call for topic 3 20:31:35 zzz: Trust fund. 20:31:52 I want to propose that as a cheap alternative to incorporation. 20:32:25 ok, how about if you write up a proposal and post it somewhere and we can discuss at a future meeting? 20:32:41 With e.g. What are the legal differences? 20:33:46 declaring end of topic 3 20:33:50 back to topic 1 20:33:52 1. anoncoin.i2p console home page request (Meeh) 20:34:09 any discussions agreement or objections to anoncoin.i2p on the home page? 20:34:44 go ahead, add it 20:35:41 anoncoin could be about to go big and Meeh's working on marketing it more to the I2P community 20:35:48 last call for 1 20:36:22 I would be carefull about "getting big" even litecoin did not got big, its all a bit of a hype, but hey, great anoncoin is known for I2P 20:36:40 to bad snowden did no marketing for I2P 20:36:49 heh. 20:37:03 but talk to Meeh if you have any questions about his plans 20:37:06 I couldn't view the website, but I have no obvious objections. 20:37:08 will do 20:37:16 end of 1. I'll add it. 20:37:17 2. Git (Meeh) 20:37:30 +1 for anoncoin 20:37:38 No objections for anoncoin. 20:37:39 git - no real objection, except the resume issue and a need for a howto 20:37:40 any thoughts on git? 20:37:56 is there a resume issue? 20:38:08 Pros: 20:38:12 afaik GIT does not resume 20:38:16 Everyone knows it 20:38:24 Wait, what is resume? 20:38:32 What is the context of this topic? 20:38:50 http://zzz.i2p/topics/1588 <--- context 20:38:56 Title: zzz.i2p: Meeting Tues. Mar. 11 8 PM UTC (at zzz.i2p) 20:38:57 If the connection breaks during a fetch/clone/pull/push 20:39:03 orion: on a big clone/pull/... tunnel breaks, does git start over from beginning or in middle of transaction? 20:40:11 Everything supports it 20:40:12 Can sign or approve commits with GPG keys 20:40:12 orion: possible mive from mtn to git 20:40:12 Cons: 20:41:09 - Resume not supported (if a pull fails partway you have to start from beginning) 20:41:09 - local timezone stored in commit 20:41:09 (fix with alias git='TZ=UTC git') 20:41:41 HH recently accepted a pull request on github i2p.i2p. If he can do that, why switch to git? Is real git better than exporting? 20:42:05 real git would be anonymous as we wouldn't be using github 20:42:42 there are other issues with exporting - changes since last export not visible until the next export 20:42:49 I thought the point was to make github pulls easier 20:43:26 if a new contributor has to run git inside i2p, did we really make it any easier for him? 20:43:58 if we did what? 20:44:14 switched to git, whatever that means 20:44:37 I assume we would have in-i2p as well as clearnet git servers, much like we have them in mtn now 20:45:46 and they would sync periodically just like now. Conceptually everything stays the same, all we change is the software 20:45:53 I guess I dont know how pull requests work so I'll stop asking questions 20:47:30 pull request is like saying: "Please sync from my git repo" 20:47:56 on a conceptual level there is very little difference between git and mtn. It's surprising how similar their mechanisms are 20:47:56 how about a straw poll - anybody who has an opinion, type in ++, +, 0, -, or -- for strongly in favor/in favor/neutral/opposed/strongly opposed to moving to git 20:48:05 ++ 20:48:08 ++ 20:48:17 0 20:49:02 0 20:50:14 any volunteers to research further and report back? 20:51:08 any specifics on what to research? 20:51:28 we have e.g. viewmtn, trac, and some mtn stuff embedded in our build scripts that would all need to be addressed. Anybody to make a list of what would be required and how much work 20:51:59 and whether the resume issue is a serious problem or not 20:53:01 well then, lets put it back on Meeh since it's his agenda item. We'll ask him to report back at a future meeting. 20:53:10 anything else on 2? 20:53:12 I'll take a look, although I imagine kytv would know best about the build scripts, no? 20:53:42 the build stuff is mostly my doing 20:53:52 end of 2) 20:53:59 4. 50BTC Bitcoin client bounty - echelon go 20:54:39 ok, the native bitcoin client still has 50 BTC leftover for the task of "integrating btc client into I2P client", aka: plugin 20:55:38 there is already a btc client for I2p (IMHO giv made it) and he got 68 BTC and 30€ from the bounty for the standalone client 20:56:08 now: 50 BTC is A LOT for making a plugin. I would like to split it, e.g. 10 BTC for plugin, 40 for general fund 20:56:28 even 10BTC is a lot. 20:57:12 (1BTC is a lot) 20:57:22 (for a plugin) 20:59:04 I do not know, thats why I set it on topic 20:59:16 I do not want to be the bad guy "stealing" money from bounties 21:02:42 no objections to splitting it 21:03:00 ok 21:03:09 will do so 21:03:22 anybody else with thoughts on 4) 21:03:45 just to be clear: no objections on splitting. 21:03:52 anything else for the meeting? 21:04:23 * zzz encourages people to discuss things between meetings 21:04:41 (big objection to 50BTC going to a plugin...i mean http://coinmill.com/BTC_EUR.html#BTC=50) 21:04:45 Title: Convert Bitcoins (BTC) and Euros (EUR): Currency Exchange Rate Conversion Calculator (at coinmill.com) 21:04:53 and reminds that anybody can schedule a meeting on any topic at any time 21:05:06 * zzz *bafs* the meeting closed