--- Log opened Tue Jun 11 22:52:16 2002 22:55 < logger> logging started 22:55 <@mids> already? 22:55 < logger> yes :) 22:55 -!- mode/#iip-dev [+v logger] by mids 23:23 < I> 23:23 @933.23 23:23 < I> heh, evil time --- Day changed Wed Jun 12 2002 00:09 -!- mode/#iip-dev [+oo UserX nop] by mids 00:39 -!- mode/#iip-dev [+o codeshark] by nop 00:39 <@mids> hey codeshark 00:39 <@codeshark> hey 00:41 < UnDeRToW> hi, good night everybody 00:41 <@nop> night 00:49 <+BluePaperBoy> hi 00:49 <+BluePaperBoy> did I miss the meeting yet? 00:50 <@mids> Tue Jun 11 22:50:18 UTC 2002 00:50 <@mids> almost 00:50 <+BluePaperBoy> just in time :) 00:55 <+BluePaperBoy> 4 minutes 20 seconds ;) 00:56 <@nop> ok 00:57 <+BluePaperBoy> sorry, just getting antsy :) 00:58 <@nop> hehe 00:59 <@mids> lets get started 00:59 <@mids> first of all I want to congratulate UnDeRToW, he passed his exams 01:00 <+BluePaperBoy> 0 01:00 < UnDeRToW> :) 01:00 <+BluePaperBoy> :) 01:00 <@nop> awesome 01:00 <+BluePaperBoy> it has begun :P 01:00 <@mids> all the important docs are on http://mids.student.utwente.nl/~mids/iip/ 01:00 <+BluePaperBoy> err, my count down ended :P 01:00 <@mids> this is the 4th meeting 01:00 <@mids> it is public, and unmoderated as long as it isnt chaotic 01:01 <@mids> if it become moderated, message an operator or somebody with voice, the line that you want to say 01:01 <@mids> welcome :) 01:01 <@nop> welcome all 01:01 <@mids> a logfile is recorded 01:01 <@mids> and available for everybody 01:01 <@mids> including for those who are too late 01:01 <@mids> . 01:02 <@mids> got something to add nop ? 01:02 <@nop> thnx you for all coming 01:03 <@nop> and contributing to IIP as a user/tester, developer, or otherwise 01:03 <@codeshark> i'm here 01:03 <@nop> let's see what's on the agenda for today 01:03 <@mids> 1) Welcome 01:03 <@mids> 2) Network / Channel policies 01:03 <@mids> 3) Website 01:03 <@mids> 4) Documentation status 01:03 <@mids> A) Questions? 01:03 <@mids> B) Next meeting 01:03 <@mids> attition: something about iip 1.1 01:03 <@mids> (forgot to add that) 01:03 <@mids> . 01:04 <@nop> ok 01:04 <@nop> 2 network / channel policies 01:04 <@nop> mids if you would please 01:04 <@mids> sure 01:04 <@mids> we had something happening in #anonymous 01:04 <@mids> I kind of missed it 01:05 <@mids> but thanks to my big brother logging, I got to see it later 01:05 <@mids> there was a little incident that showed us the need for some policies 01:05 <@mids> since this network is going to become more serious 01:05 <@mids> with more people attending 01:05 <@nop> may I add something 01:05 <@mids> the risk of possible conflicts is always there 01:05 <@nop> ? 01:05 <@mids> sure 01:06 <@nop> The definitive goal of IIP 01:06 <@nop> is to allow freedom of speech 01:06 <@nop> and to fight censorship and oppression 01:06 <@nop> now we all share this common goal 01:06 <@nop> assuming 01:06 <@nop> so there are moderators 01:06 <@nop> for channels 01:07 <@nop> which gives us a sense of power, but really, is very minimal control, banning anonymity is not exactly easy 01:07 <@nop> but the purpose is to make sure everyone is not inhibited by their speech 01:07 <@nop> and can say what they would like to say 01:07 <@mids> as you maybe all know 01:07 <@nop> so keeping this in mind 01:08 <@nop> continue 01:08 <@mids> 'we' dont often know what is going on on the network 01:08 <@mids> exept for the public channels 01:08 <@mids> inclusing #anonymous, but also #iip and #help 01:08 <@mids> maybe I forgot more official channels, if so 01:08 <@mids> inform me 01:08 <@mids> because those channels kindof determine the public look of IIP, we need to get some rules done 01:09 <@mids> why? 01:09 <@mids> 2 reasons 01:09 <@mids> tell the users what the operators can do 01:09 <@mids> and visa versa 01:09 <@mids> normally, on IIP, every channel 01:09 <@mids> should be seen as a sovereign country 01:09 <@mids> since there is almost none network wide power 01:09 <@mids> every channel got to have its own rules 01:10 <@mids> which can differ from channel to channel 01:10 <@mids> if you have a channel names #sailing 01:10 <@mids> we cant do nothing there 01:10 <@mids> even if we hate the boat that you like to sail with :) 01:10 <@mids> anyway 01:10 <@mids> I want to propose some rules 01:11 <@mids> 3 categories 01:11 <@mids> 1) network wide 01:11 <@mids> 2) #anonymous 01:11 <@mids> 3) other official channels 01:11 <@mids> for all other channels, we have no power as IIP team 01:11 <@mids> except for the network rules 01:11 <@mids> any questions so far? 01:12 <@mids> nope? 01:12 <@mids> great 01:12 <@mids> I have thought of these 3 rules for the whole network: 01:12 < ellison> seems to me that #iip should be protected as well 01:12 <@mids> - no flooding 01:12 <@mids> - no spamming 01:13 < ellison> oh, 3) other protected channels 01:13 <@mids> - no acts that endanger the existance of IIP 01:13 <@mids> . 01:13 <@mids> ellison: yes? 01:13 < ellison> nevermind, 'scuse me 01:13 <@mids> np 01:13 <+BluePaperBoy> acts that endanger the existance of IIP? please clarify 01:14 <@mids> sure 01:14 <@mids> that is a pretty broad subject 01:14 <@mids> but whatever happens here.. we shouldnt risk the continuity of IIP 01:14 <@mids> some posibilities: 01:14 <@mids> ddos attacks 01:14 <@mids> child porn 01:15 <@mids> terrorist cells etc 01:15 <@mids> if we know about those things 01:15 <@mids> we have to forbid them 01:15 <@mids> because countries will attack us if we support such things 01:15 < UnDeRToW> but how we control that? 01:15 <@mids> good question 01:16 < UnDeRToW> we cant spy other users 01:16 <@mids> sure 01:16 <+BluePaperBoy> we shouldn't atleast 01:16 < ellison> ddos is a separate matter from the rest 01:16 <@mids> but if such happens, without us knowing? 01:16 <@mids> ellison: yes, correct.. ddos is more flooding 01:16 < ellison> for child porn, terrorist cells, money laundering and other statust bugaboos, we should insist on proof from the entity complaining or threatening to shut down IIP 01:18 <@mids> so if an entity comes with evidence about activity x 01:18 <@nop> evidence that they have to prove that it is the specific user 01:18 < ellison> yup 01:19 <@mids> then we can nuke his trent accounts, jupe his nick etc 01:19 < ellison> if the entity complaining has no power to harm IIP, we ignore them 01:19 <@mids> but such claims should always be verified 01:19 <+BluePaperBoy> if IIP is truly anonymous, how could that be proven and what steps could be taken to stop the person is question 01:19 <@mids> ellison: exactly 01:20 < ellison> if they can harm IIP, we insist on proof 01:20 <@mids> BluePaperBoy: we can deal with nyms, not with real persons 01:20 <+BluePaperBoy> mids: but then they can merely change their IIP identity and continue 01:20 < ellison> if they meet the proof requirements, we delete their Trent accounts as you said, and then send a report to the entity which complained 01:21 < ellison> BPB: yeah, that's the beauty of a pseudoanonymous system... 01:21 <@mids> for the sake of the common IIP wealth, such complaints should be globally announced I think 01:22 <@nop> agreed 01:22 < ellison> BPB: say some soldiers in afghanistan discovered a computer with IIP logs which proved that terrorists were using IIP to communicate ebtween their cells 01:22 <@mids> nop: what is the official email address for such things? 01:22 <+BluePaperBoy> put on the website? 01:22 < ellison> that would consistute proof, I think 01:22 <@nop> iip@invisiblenet.net 01:23 <+BluePaperBoy> ellison: be we would no not who it was or how to stop them 01:23 < ellison> we'd have their nym names 01:23 < ellison> and we could just delete their records from Trent (assuming they used Trent) 01:23 <@mids> okay, governments and other entities should email their proof of misusage (pgp signed & encrypted ofcourse) to iip@invisiblenet.net 01:23 < ellison> heh 01:24 <@nop> we still have very little power 01:24 <@nop> to stop them 01:24 <@nop> and the most we can do 01:24 <@nop> is prohibit them from using trent 01:24 <@nop> etc 01:24 <@nop> at least under that nym 01:24 <@mids> ofcourse we will do that 01:24 <@mids> whatever is in our power 01:24 < ellison> (this inability to exert controlling censorship is part of the good design of IIP, IMHO) 01:25 <@nop> it only gets better with age 01:25 <@UserX> what do we do if entities try and demand logging? 01:25 <@mids> UserX: they may join channels 01:25 < ellison> remove IIP servers from their jurisdiction 01:25 <@mids> and log all traffic 01:25 <+BluePaperBoy> so IIP'll do like most governments and "officially condemn" 01:26 <@nop> try being key operative word 01:26 <@nop> the most logging that is taking place 01:26 <@nop> is the irc clients 01:27 <@nop> but the big concern is coercing or forcing a user to log 01:27 <@mids> everybody should understand that he/she acts here as a nym 01:28 <@mids> and every relationshop between his/her real identify and the nym is a possible danger on his anon/pseudo nymity 01:29 <+BluePaperBoy> What about bad mouthing IIP and convincing people to leave/stop supporting...would that be considered "acts that endanger the existance of IIP" (just to clarify) 01:29 <@nop> no 01:29 <+BluePaperBoy> thank you 01:29 <@nop> but 01:29 <@nop> it's not nice 01:29 <@nop> ;) 01:30 <+BluePaperBoy> I was just wondering how liberally mids' statement would be taken :) 01:30 <@mids> ok 01:30 <@mids> now we have another thing 01:30 <@mids> maybe it is channel, maybe network wide 01:30 <@mids> 'dont reveal the identify of others without permission' 01:31 <+BluePaperBoy> I don't think that should be regulated 01:31 <@nop> it's more of a request 01:31 <@nop> not a regulation 01:31 <@mids> maybe on a personal / per channel base? 01:32 <@mids> ok, got network covered... lets move to #anonymous 01:32 <@mids> what is the main purpose of this channel 01:32 <@mids> and what is its name :) 01:32 <@mids> personally I think that it is about freedom of speech 01:32 <+BluePaperBoy> bash liberals? 01:32 <@mids> & that is what IIP is about 01:33 <@mids> so, I don't think that any additional rules are needed except for the network ones 01:33 < Robert> . 01:33 <@mids> with the suggestion to move offtopic stuff to the appropriate channels 01:34 <@mids> freenet stuff may be discussed there 01:34 <@mids> but should be not taken too seriouyd 01:34 <@mids> serioud 01:34 <@mids> err 01:34 <@mids> whatever :) 01:35 <@mids> if someone is doing / saying things that you dont like 01:35 <@mids> consider using /ignore 01:35 <@mids> (see your IRC client manual for more information) 01:35 <@mids> other additions to #anonymous? 01:35 < Neo> /ignore #anonymous works pretty good for me :) 01:36 <@mids> Neo: I think you mean /part #anonymous :) 01:36 < Neo> :) 01:36 <@mids> now the other official channels... 01:36 <@mids> which do we have? 01:36 <@mids> I think : #iip 01:36 <@mids> #iip-dev and #help 01:37 <+BluePaperBoy> what about #freenet? 01:37 <@mids> hm, since there is no real relationship between freenet and IIP, I think that that isnt an official matter 01:38 < ellison> #terrorist-plots 01:38 < ellison> ;-) 01:38 <@mids> #freenet channel policies should be discussed with the #freenet founder and operators 01:38 <@mids> -Trent(anon.iip)- The channel #terrorist-plots is NOT registered 01:38 <@mids> ok 01:38 <@mids> #iip is the main serious IIP channel 01:38 <@mids> (imho) 01:39 <@mids> so, stuff there should be related to IIP 01:39 <@mids> and should be correct.. don't give incorrect info there 01:39 <@mids> maybe same for #help 01:39 <@mids> anyway 01:39 <@mids> I got the hint that we are getting bored 01:39 <@mids> :) 01:40 <@mids> , 01:40 <@nop> ok 01:40 <@nop> basically 01:40 <@nop> no inhibiting people's speech 01:40 <@nop> only time to regulate 01:40 <@nop> is if others are inhibiting free speech 01:40 <@nop> aka spamming 01:40 <@nop> or flooding 01:41 <@nop> and do not abuse operator powers to inhibit speech 01:41 <@nop> got it 01:41 <@nop> good 01:41 <@nop> move on 01:41 <@mids> yup 01:41 <@mids> official thingL 01:41 <@mids> reinstate cohesion 01:41 <@nop> we will once we talk to him and review the rules 01:41 <@nop> he should be re-instated 01:41 <@mids> done 01:42 <@mids> with level 2 01:42 <@mids> over & out :) 01:42 <@mids> 3) Website 01:43 <@mids> -------- 01:43 <@mids> how is the design going? 01:43 <+BluePaperBoy> ? 01:43 * mids looks at the agenda 01:43 <@mids> ellison: got something to say? :) 01:44 < ellison> ah 01:44 < ellison> working on it right now 01:44 < ellison> looks cool, trust me. 01:44 < ellison> ;-) 01:44 <+BluePaperBoy> which "sample" is his 01:44 <+BluePaperBoy> ? 01:44 < ellison> I might have something to show by the end of the meeting - if not then, later tonight 01:45 <@mids> another design (from tikk) is on http://www.nokhockey.com/scott/IIP/home2.htm 01:45 <@mids> hm, nop, can you say something about "wear IIP? 01:47 <@nop> oh 01:48 <@nop> hold please 01:48 <@nop> on phone 01:48 <@mids> ah 01:48 <@mids> "if you cant wait till the IIP site is done and already want to show your passion with IIP : http://www.cafepress.com/invisiblenet 01:48 <@mids> nop got some nice stuff there 01:48 * mids bought some IIP tshirts :) 01:49 <@nop> all funding goes to fund the project 01:49 <@mids> but most goes to the cafepress guys :( 01:49 <@mids> I want to have a black tshirt with a white IIP logo 01:50 <@mids> if you know a way to get it... tell us :) 01:50 < ellison> i want a black t-shirt with a black logo... 01:51 <@mids> ellison: noted.. we will have them too :) 01:51 < ellison> :-) 01:51 <@mids> other comments? 01:51 <+BluePaperBoy> I want something blue :) 01:51 <@mids> BluePaperBoy: cool 01:51 <@mids> I think that the logo's that Banks made are available 01:51 <+BluePaperBoy> ...can't find anything though ;( 02:07 -!- Topic for #iip-dev: Info, agenda, log : http://mids.student.utwente.nl/~mids/iip/ | Tuesday 23:00 UTC - http://e-store.invisiblenet.net 02:07 [Users #iip-dev] 02:07 [@codeshark ] [ ellison] [ logger] [ Robert ] [ UserX] 02:07 [@nop ] [ epoch ] [ mids ] [ Rooster77] 02:07 [+BluePaperBoy] [ I ] [ Neo ] [ UnDeRToW ] 02:07 -!- Irssi: #iip-dev: Total of 13 nicks [2 ops, 0 halfops, 1 voices, 10 normal] 02:07 -!- Irssi: Join to #iip-dev was synced in 1 secs 02:07 < Neo> A new protocol has now been implemented for IIP 1.1 details of it are at: http://mids.student.utwente.nl/~mids/iip/meeting4/iip11proto.txt 02:07 < Neo> this adds error detection and fixes problems introduced by the server having a static key 02:07 < Neo> (4 the logger) 02:08 < logger> gracia 02:10 <@nop> ok 02:10 <@nop> next 02:10 < logger> 3,4] 02:11 -!- mode/#iip-dev [+o mids] by Trent 02:13 < UnDeRToW> ... 02:14 <@mids> hmpf 02:14 <@mids> sorry ppl 02:14 <@mids> blaim the civ :) 02:14 <@mids> did you all see the new network diagrams? 02:14 <@nop> yes 02:14 <@nop> links etc 02:15 <@mids> question: 02:15 <@mids> bigendian == network order? 02:15 <@nop> big endian == byte order 02:15 <@mids> byte order != network order? 02:16 <@nop> ok 02:16 <@nop> any questions 02:16 <@nop> before we close the meeting 02:16 < UserX> as i understand bigendian byte order is the network byte order 02:16 <@mids> thanks UserX 02:17 -!- mode/#iip-dev [+o UserX] by mids 02:17 < UnDeRToW> can we translate the isproxy too? 02:18 <@mids> can you explain? windows, unix, docs? 02:19 < UnDeRToW> the program to join here 02:20 <@mids> how do such programs work? do they detect the language automatically? 02:20 <@nop> locale I guess 02:21 < UnDeRToW> or have different versions 02:21 < UnDeRToW> spannish, french ..... 02:22 <@UserX> there are some hooks for adding translations (gettext style) to isproxy but no support for doing actual translations yet 02:22 <@mids> I think that is a good thing.. certainly not for 1.1.. but to keep in mind, maybe 1.2 ? 02:22 < UnDeRToW> great 02:23 < UnDeRToW> and also a we have to start a FAQ 02:23 <@mids> but, I think the work involved shouldnt underestimated... chinese characters sound complex to me 02:24 <@mids> UserX: any idea how the windows i18n is? 02:24 <@codeshark> you can use resource files on windows 02:24 <@nop> chinese require double byte 02:24 <@nop> unicode 02:24 <@codeshark> yes 02:24 <@UserX> mids: do you mean how hard it would be to do translation? 02:24 <@mids> Rooster77 knows something about htat 02:25 <@mids> UserX: no, more the unicode / utf8 support 02:26 < Rooster77> Rooster77 is not fluent yet, but is working on it.. 02:27 <+BluePaperBoy> just give it to a chinese programmer ;) 02:27 < Rooster77> good idea...! 02:27 <@UserX> not that familar with it but as i understand you can select codepages for interpreting 8 bit characters 02:28 <@mids> okay... more questions? 02:30 < UnDeRToW> i need the new docs to update the translation 02:30 <@mids> okay, while they are still under review, you can get them from the CVS 02:30 < UnDeRToW> ok 02:30 <@mids> do you know how to use CVS? 02:30 <+BluePaperBoy> mids: are we stuck with that crappy iip logo? What ever happend to the copyrighted casper pics? 02:30 < UnDeRToW> yes 02:30 <@mids> UnDeRToW: contrib/htmldoc/ 02:31 <@nop> which logo 02:31 <@mids> UnDeRToW: thats where everything is 02:31 <+BluePaperBoy> the two trenchcoat guys then the p 02:31 < UnDeRToW> ok 02:31 <+BluePaperBoy> ...on the clothing ;) 02:31 <@mids> I like the new design 02:32 < UnDeRToW> and the FAQ 02:32 < UnDeRToW> we have to do one 02:32 <@mids> UnDeRToW: banks started some faq items in the manual too 02:32 < UnDeRToW> i see almost always the same quesitons 02:32 < UnDeRToW> ok 02:32 < UnDeRToW> i will take a look 02:33 < UnDeRToW> last thing 02:33 <@nop> k 02:33 <@nop> I think we're done 02:33 < UnDeRToW> i think 02:34 < UnDeRToW> would be usefull to being able to change your trent password 02:35 <@mids> ok 02:35 < UnDeRToW> if you want to change you pass you have to drop the nick 02:35 <@mids> would it be needed to enter it twice? 02:35 < UnDeRToW> but if you drop you loose the channels 02:35 <+BluePaperBoy> mids: that would be nice 02:36 <@mids> I'll think about it :) 02:37 <@mids> (no reason not to do it, just someone has to code it) 02:37 <@nop> should be like 5 lines of code 02:37 <@mids> well, 6 02:37 <@mids> :) 02:38 <+BluePaperBoy> so it'll be done within a year I guess :) 02:38 <@mids> very likely 02:39 <@nop> ok 02:39 <@mids> remember me everydat 02:39 <@mids> day 02:39 <@nop> one thing 02:39 <@nop> http://e-store.invisiblenet.net 02:39 <@nop> support the project 02:39 <@nop> will work on getting black on white 02:39 <@nop> ellison 02:39 <@nop> anything on website yet 02:39 < ellison> hey, 02:39 < ellison> about 1 hour away from something I'd be comfortable showing 02:40 <@nop> ok 02:40 <@nop> is it like just started 02:40 <@nop> or is it fully functional 02:40 <@nop> the one you're showing 02:40 <@nop> ? 02:40 < ellison> this is a photoshop draft 02:40 <+BluePaperBoy> are you hardcoding or cheating? 02:40 < ellison> ? 02:41 < ellison> it's quite a few steps away from a finished site, but I can break out the HTML for templates in a day or so once the design is finalized 02:42 <@nop> ok 02:42 <@nop> kewl 02:45 <@mids> okay folks, I am going to sleep.. thanks for the patience :) 02:46 < UnDeRToW> me too 02:46 < UnDeRToW> i have to wake up in 4 hours 02:46 < UnDeRToW> :( 02:46 < UnDeRToW> bye 02:46 <+BluePaperBoy> bye 03:08 < logger> logging ended --- Log closed Wed Jun 12 03:08:35 2002